The friction
Which factor is the primary deterrent to sustainable habit formation: cost, inconvenience or lack of social proof?
The Ecohance Panel maps the intention-action gap through five low-friction data collection waves, spaced exactly 14 days apart from August to October 2026.
We test whether economic cost, physical inconvenience or lack of social proof creates the greatest friction in daily sustainable decision-making.
Which factor is the primary deterrent to sustainable habit formation: cost, inconvenience or lack of social proof?
How does stated intent correlate with reported execution 14 days later?
Does social-norm framing increase the likelihood of a pro-environmental decision?
Time and effort will be cited as friction more often than economic cost.
Participants exposed to peer-norm information will show stronger habit retention.
Behavioural intent will peak at Wave 1 and decay by Wave 3 without structural support.
A custom five-question visual survey combining discrete choices, behavioural recall and friction attribution.
Registration closes after Wave 1 so no late entrant disrupts the longitudinal time series.
Responses under five seconds are flagged. Fewer than three waves excludes a record from primary analysis.
Email addresses are used for authentication and notification, separate from analysis responses.
Descriptive statistics and time-series analysis track friction, retention and intention-action decay.
An anonymised dataset and working paper are planned after the study and privacy review.
Read the complete pre-registration protocol, consent statement and participant guide before joining.